|
The illiterate of the 21st century will not be
those who cannot read
and write, but those
who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.
Alvin Toffler, writer and futurist
SMART Boards are
only the beginning
Discussion
has now turned to, what next?
But what a great beginning! In January 2007, the Amphi Foundation, through a
generous grant from BHP Copper Inc., launched the 21C Classroom
Technology Initiative to provide
Amphi students and teachers with durable classroom technologies, beginning with SMART
Boards.
We've fully funded one for each of Amphi's 21
schools, matched donations from individuals and PTO's for 20 more,
and as of the start of the 2007 - '08 school year, are gearing up
for Round 4.
The
SMART Board is an electronic white board that
significantly improves learning by linking computers and the
Internet with interactive, touch-screen technology.
A teacher prepares a lesson on her computer, projects
it onto the board, and guides students through the material by
touching on the images and the toolbars. Even cooler, teachers and
students can also access the Internet to incorporate additional
information into the lesson.
Students, in turn, utilize the SMART Board to
demonstrate their grasp of the subject material, ask and answer
questions, and enhance their classroom presentations.
Our own experience supports the research we based
this equally smart decision on; students become more engaged with
both the teacher and the material, are thus more interested in the
subject and motivated to learn, and as a result, retain more of what
they learn.
All of Amphi's schools are qualified to receive
funding under the 21st C. Classroom Technology Initiative. There is
no needs-based formula. As the "knowledge gap" grows ever wider, an
ironically equalizing effect is that technological "know-how" and
"know-not" are becoming as important in determining a high school
graduate's potential as socioeconomic "have" and "have-not". So the
most logical course is to first identify a needed technology
and then ensure that every student will have access to it.
The decision on which classrooms to equip rests with
school principals, in consultation with their staffs and teachers,
who know best which grades or subjects will benefit most and which
teachers are the most ready and willing to learn the technology and
incorporate it into their classrooms.
At this stage, we're matching dollars donated for
additional SMART Boards until the demand is satisfied, to be
determined when principals are satisfied that enough classrooms have
been equipped to provide access to as many of their students as
possible or feasible.
|
To Sponsor a Classroom
The Foundation will match 50% of the
cost per unit, or $2,000.00 of the current cost of $4,000.00*. This includes the SMART
Board and projector, ceiling mount, electrical set-up, and
installation.
Individuals, businesses, PTO's, and other
organizations interested in purchasing a SMART Board for a
particular school should contact the Foundation at 520-696-5147.
We'll answer your questions and put you in touch with the school's
principal.
SMART Boards
in educational settings >
The Partnership for 21st
Century Skills >
Request a brochure
>
* Please be advised that costs may vary,
up or down, depending on volume
pricing, changes in installation costs and other factors.
What's next?
Very soon, we will decide on "the next new thing". We're
already seeing where personal computing is headed in the SMART Board's
touch-screen technology and integration of Internet access. In
classrooms with only one or two computers, this interactivity extends
personal computing to every student. Whatever comes next, it should meet the following criteria:
• Durability. Will it stand the 'reasonable
test' of time? Every type of organization, but especially a
tax-supported school district, needs to be mindful of a technology's
lifespan, which can be very short. So we've sought, and will continue to
seek advice and opinions of people who are engaged in highly technical
professions or businesses to find out which technologies, in their view,
will most likely deliver "the biggest bang for the buck" over a longer
haul than next year. It's an imperfect choice but does weed out
'solutions' we should not invest in.
• Usability. Is it user-friendly? A technology
may be terrific in one setting but inappropriate in the classroom if
even the most tech-savvy teacher would find it especially difficult to
learn or to use as an effective, everyday teaching tool.
• Adoptability. Provided a technology is durable
and user-friendly, will the users, i.e. students and/or teachers,
actually use it? In other words, once the early-adopters have
embraced it and word spreads, will their positive experience inspire
others to want it in their classrooms?
• Equitability. Our goal is to put worthwhile
technologies within reach of every Amphi student, in the short term and
over time, as their skills and needs progress, grade to grade, and as
their subjects require, regardless of a school's apparent socio-economic
status.
In addition to classroom tools, there may be occasion
to evaluate investing in technology infrastructure. However,
assisting the school district in meeting its infrastructure needs is
not under consideration by the Foundation at this time, although, as
everything else, that could change at any time.
|
|